Obama and Clinton used Energy Department deals to run racketeering operations for personal profit. This extended to electric car and solar deals as well as uranium, lithium batteries and other mining profiteering.

Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating energy industry transactions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to Barack Obama. But a look at who was in the CFIUS tells a different story. It's the heads of most departments of the federal government. So who was on the CFIUS panel in January of 2013?
The members of CFIUS include the heads of the following departments and offices:
1. Department of the Treasury (chair) - Timothy Geitner, who was Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs under Bill Clinton from 1998-2001 and appointed to the position by Obama. He ran part of the DOE Clean Tech Crash cover ups.
2. Department of Justice - Eric Holder - US Attorney for DC appointed by Bill Clinton from 1993-97, 29th US Deputy Attorney General appointed by Bill Clinton from 1997-2001 and appointed to the position by Obama. He ran part of the DOE Clean Tech Crash cover ups.
3. Department of Homeland Security - Janet Napolitano - Appointed US Attorney for Arizona in 1993 by Bill Clinton, appointed to the position by Obama
4. Department of Commerce - Rebecca Blank - One of three members of Bill Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers from 1997-99, was Deputy Secretary but designated the next to lead the department by then Secretary John Bryson, who left for medical reasons and was appointed by Obama
5. Department of Defense - Leon Panetta - Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff from 1994-97, appointed to the position by Obama. He then ran the CIA and then had to leave under pressure.
6. Department of State - Hillary Clinton - Obvious. Even if you go with the idea that the Assitant SecState was on the panel, she's his boss.
7. Department of Energy - Steven Chu The oddball, who's been described as politically "clueless" and " a smart guy who said lots of stupid things". The criminal front goat for the whole energy industry scam.
8. Office of the U.S. Trade Representative - Ron Kirk - Campaigned for Hillary in 2016, seems to be familiar with Clinton pre-2013, and was appointed his position by Obama. Here he is in 2015 hanging out with Clinton and Obama on the golf course.
9. Office of Science & Technology Policy - John Holdren - Was one of Bill Clinton's PCAST advisors from 1994 to 2001, was appointed to the position by Obama. Bonus points, he was a winner of the 7th annual Heinz awards, and if you remember, John Kerry is married to Teresa Heinz, who is actually the widow of H. John Heinz III. He pushed for Climate issues.
All of them made stock market and political profits off of Department of Energy Clean Tech and Policy decisions under Obama/DNC policies.

FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow
By John Solomon and Alison Spann - 10/17/17 06:00 AM EDT

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.
Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.
They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
The racketeering scheme was conducted “with the consent of higher level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.
Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.
The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply.
When this sale was used by Trump on the campaign trail last year, Hillary Clinton’s spokesman said she was not involved in the committee review and noted the State Department official who handled it said she “never intervened ... on any [Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States] matter.”
In 2011, the administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp. Before then, Tenex had been limited to selling U.S. nuclear power plants reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s Megatons to Megawatts peace program.
“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials.
The Obama administration’s decision to approve Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One has been a source of political controversy since 2015.
That’s when conservative author Peter Schweitzer and The New York Times documented how Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees and his charitable foundation collected millions in donations from parties interested in the deal while Hillary Clinton presided on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
The Obama administration and the Clintons defended their actions at the time, insisting there was no evidence that any Russians or donors engaged in wrongdoing and there was no national security reason for any member of the committee to oppose the Uranium One deal.
But FBI, Energy Department and court documents reviewed by The Hill show the FBI in fact had gathered substantial evidence well before the committee’s decision that Vadim Mikerin — the main Russian overseeing Putin’s nuclear expansion inside the United States — was engaged in wrongdoing starting in 2009.
Then-Attorney General Eric Holder was among the Obama administration officials joining Hillary Clinton on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the time the Uranium One deal was approved. Multiple current and former government officials told The Hill they did not know whether the FBI or DOJ ever alerted committee members to the criminal activity they uncovered.
Spokesmen for Holder and Clinton did not return calls seeking comment. The Justice Department also didn’t comment.
Mikerin was a director of Rosatom’s Tenex in Moscow since the early 2000s, where he oversaw Rosatom’s nuclear collaboration with the United States under the Megatons to Megwatts program and its commercial uranium sales to other countries. In 2010, Mikerin was dispatched to the U.S. on a work visa approved by the Obama administration to open Rosatom’s new American arm called Tenam.
Between 2009 and January 2012, Mikerin “did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire confederate and agree with other persons … to obstruct, delay and affect commerce and the movement of an article and commodity (enriched uranium) in commerce by extortion,” a November 2014 indictment stated.
His illegal conduct was captured with the help of a confidential witness, an American businessman, who began making kickback payments at Mikerin’s direction and with the permission of the FBI. The first kickback payment recorded by the FBI through its informant was dated Nov. 27, 2009, the records show.
In evidentiary affidavits signed in 2014 and 2015, an Energy Department agent assigned to assist the FBI in the case testified that Mikerin supervised a “racketeering scheme” that involved extortion, bribery, money laundering and kickbacks that were both directed by and provided benefit to more senior officials back in Russia.
“As part of the scheme, Mikerin, with the consent of higher level officials at TENEX and Rosatom (both Russian state-owned entities) would offer no-bid contracts to US businesses in exchange for kickbacks in the form of money payments made to some offshore banks accounts,” Agent David Gadren testified.
“Mikerin apparently then shared the proceeds with other co-conspirators associated with TENEX in Russia and elsewhere,” the agent added.
The investigation was ultimately supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, an Obama appointee who now serves as President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, now the deputy FBI director under Trump, Justice Department documents show.
Both men now play a key role in the current investigation into possible, but still unproven, collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election cycle. McCabe is under congressional and Justice Department inspector general investigation in connection with money his wife’s Virginia state Senate campaign accepted in 2015 from now-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe at a time when McAuliffe was reportedly under investigation by the FBI.
The connections to the current Russia case are many. The Mikerin probe began in 2009 when Robert Mueller, now the special counsel in charge of the Trump case, was still FBI director. And it ended in late 2015 under the direction of then-FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump fired earlier this year.
Its many twist and turns aside, the FBI nuclear industry case proved a gold mine, in part because it uncovered a new Russian money laundering apparatus that routed bribe and kickback payments through financial instruments in Cyprus, Latvia and Seychelles. A Russian financier in New Jersey was among those arrested for the money laundering, court records show.
The case also exposed a serious national security breach: Mikerin had given a contract to an American trucking firm called Transport Logistics International that held the sensitive job of transporting Russia’s uranium around the United States in return for more than $2 million in kickbacks from some of its executives, court records show.
One of Mikerin’s former employees told the FBI that Tenex officials in Russia specifically directed the scheme to “allow for padded pricing to include kickbacks,” agents testified in one court filing.
Bringing down a major Russian nuclear corruption scheme that had both compromised a sensitive uranium transportation asset inside the U.S. and facilitated international money laundering would seem a major feather in any law enforcement agency’s cap.
But the Justice Department and FBI took little credit in 2014 when Mikerin, the Russian financier and the trucking firm executives were arrested and charged.
The only public statement occurred a year later when the Justice Department put out a little-noticed press release in August 2015, just days before Labor Day. The release noted that the various defendants had reached plea deals.
By that time, the criminal cases against Mikerin had been narrowed to a single charge of money laundering for a scheme that officials admitted stretched from 2004 to 2014. And though agents had evidence of criminal wrongdoing they collected since at least 2009, federal prosecutors only cited in the plea agreement a handful of transactions that occurred in 2011 and 2012, well after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States’s approval.
The final court case also made no mention of any connection to the influence peddling conversations the FBI undercover informant witnessed about the Russian nuclear officials trying to ingratiate themselves with the Clintons even though agents had gathered documents showing the transmission of millions of dollars from Russia’s nuclear industry to an American entity that had provided assistance to Bill Clinton’s foundation, sources confirmed to The Hill.
The lack of fanfare left many key players in Washington with no inkling that a major Russian nuclear corruption scheme with serious national security implications had been uncovered.
On Dec. 15, 2015, the Justice Department put out a release stating that Mikerin, “a former Russian official residing in Maryland was sentenced today to 48 months in prison” and ordered to forfeit more than $2.1 million.
Ronald Hosko, who served as the assistant FBI director in charge of criminal cases when the investigation was underway, told The Hill he did not recall ever being briefed about Mikerin’s case by the counterintelligence side of the bureau despite the criminal charges that were being lodged.
“I had no idea this case was being conducted,” a surprised Hosko said in an interview.
Likewise, major congressional figures were also kept in the dark.
Former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), who chaired the House Intelligence Committee during the time the FBI probe was being conducted, told The Hill that he had never been told anything about the Russian nuclear corruption case even though many fellow lawmakers had serious concerns about the Obama administration’s approval of the Uranium One deal.
“Not providing information on a corruption scheme before the Russian uranium deal was approved by U.S. regulators and engage appropriate congressional committees has served to undermine U.S. national security interests by the very people charged with protecting them,” he said. “The Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise is breathtaking.”
FBI Kept Russian Bribery Plot Under Wraps Before Obama Administration Approved Nuclear Deal With Moscow
By Jessica Kwong

World FBI Russia probe FBI Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton Department of Justice Obama Administration
The Obama administration signed a controversial nuclear deal with Moscow despite prior FBI findings that Russian officials were bribing their way into the U.S. atomic energy industry, according to government documents just published by The Hill.
A confidential U.S. witness deployed by the FBI infiltrated Russia’s nuclear industry and made secret recordings, collected financial records and intercepted emails dating back to 2009 that showed that Moscow engaged in bribery and kickbacks with an American uranium trucking company, documents show.
But the Obama administration insisted no evidence existed of Russian interference and that there were no national security concerns for committee members to go against the deal in 2010.
Keep up with this story and more by subscribing now
The deal that boosted Vladimir Putin’s nuclear footprint in the U.S. took place in October 2010 when the State Department and the Committee on Foreign Investment unanimously agreed to a partial sale of Uranium One, a Canadian mining company, to the major Russian nuclear company Rosatom, effectively sending more than 20 percent of the U.S.’s uranium to Moscow.
In 2011, the Obama administration gave the green light for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell uranium to American nuclear power plants. Before the deal, Tenex could only sell reprocessed uranium from dismantled Soviet nuclear firearms to power plants in the U.S.
Russian exortion threats and kickbacks brought legitimate national security concerns, "And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a souce who insisted on anonymity out of fear of retribution told The Hill.
Then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, who was appointed by Obama and now works as President Donald Trump’s deputy attorney general, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who serves as deputy FBI director under Trump, supervised the investigation, documents show.
FBI agents also gathered documents and a witness account that Russian officials routed millions of dollars to ex-President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat on a committee that gave a nod to the dealings with Moscow.
Like the Obama administration, the Clintons said there was no evidence to prompt them to go the other way on the Uranium One deal.
The Department of Justice investigated the Russian plot for close to four years, keeping the information under wraps while the Obama administration approved the deal instead of bringing immediate charges,
A November 2014 indictment states that Vadim Mikerin, a director of Rosatom’s Tenex, “did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire confederate and agree with other persons … to obstruct, delay and affect commerce and the movement of an article and commodity (enriched uranium) in commerce by extortion” from 2009 to January 2012.
The House Intelligence Committee chairman at the time, former Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan, told The Hill that he was never informed about the "breathtaking" Russian efforts to manipulate America’s enterprise. Many lawmakers back then had serious concerns about the Uranium One deal, he said.
“Not providing information on a corruption scheme before the Russian uranium deal was approved by U.S. regulators and engage appropriate congressional committees has served to undermine U.S. national security interests by the very people charged with protecting them,” Rogers said, short of labeling it a coverup.
But the newly published documents will certainly raise questions about Obama's nuclear deal — a topic that then-candidate Donald Trump consistently raised on the campaign trail even before he took over the White House and had access to the information revealed this week.

The Uranium One Scandal is the key to it all... (politics)
submitted ago by thewebofslime
tl;dr Uranium One is the name of a South African company that bought Kazakh mining interests (and other places) through bribery and the political influence of the Clintons. Later, bought by Frank Giustra’s Canadian company, who then sold the company to Russia. The Podestas got paid. The money cycled through a web of puppet NGO's. The media won’t cover the severity of the crimes.
The New York Times did a great article about the Uranium One scandal that America seems to have forgotten, but is very relevant, as it outlines the actual relationship between Hillary Clinton and Russia, as opposed to what we are being told in the news, today.
There are a few reasons this story is especially important.
The Panama Papers and the Podesta Emails both provide independent, primary source, direct evidence that this story is true and worse than originally stated. You can see it for yourself.
Treason is happening at the top levels of our government, where our politicians and lobbyists are willing to sell out American assets for pennies on the dollar and surprising number of them are all in on it.
The media has represented all of this as no big deal, while shamelessly trying to sell a war between Russia and the US over fake news about hacking.
It lends credibility to the idea that these people, in this social circle, are capable of running a vast, sophisticated criminal enterprise that talks in code.
We are able to trace the web of money launderers all in bed together through primary sources starting with these breadcrumbs.
The Observer does a good job of breaking down some of the relationships to make them easy to understand.
04/07/2016 Panama Papers Reveal Clinton’s Kremlin Connection
Among the Sberbank subsidiaries that the Podesta Group also represents are the Cayman Islands-based Troika Dialog Group Limited, the Cyprus-based SBGB Cyprus Limited, and the Luxembourg-based SB International.
In Podesta email #4635, it is revealed that bribes were happening through a variety of mediums.
First, with respect to the stock option agreement, there is a discrepancy in the stated vesting schedule between the one John signed back in 2011 and the one I sent to Bob which you sent back to me signed.
John transferred the resulting 75,000 common shares from the option exercise to the Leonidio LLC. As such, we would need to edit the Transfer of Share Agreement to reflect the transfer of 75,000 common shares to the LLC
Look at this image:
Search here to replicate it:
It is the proof that started this avalanche of evidence. When the Panama Papers were released, it proved Troika Dialog is a Russian front.
That is proof John Podesta works for Russia. It is an LD 1 disclosure form. It shows he is getting paid by Troika Dialog.
Big picture, this means that the entire DNC is being kept in power by the Russians with Russian money. It's just one finger in one pie, though.
It gets worse. Ruben Vardanyan has a lot of such companies, like Joule Unlimited that claimed to be able to produce clean energy from cyanobacteria... but was really just a Russian front to pay into the Clinton Foundation.
Notice the dates. This scam has been in the works for years. Media Matters was already trying to spin damage control on it in 2008.
01/31/2008 NY Times failed to note Giustra reportedly involved in Kazakhstan mining deals more than a decade ago
Uranium One posted $127 Million in revenue last quarter.
The Podesta Group fails to disclose this financial arrangement to Congress, which is, technically, treason.
Here is the Congressional Report:
Azerbaijan, Hong Kong Trade Development Council, Republic of India, Republic of Iraq, Embassy of Japan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Korea, Republic of Maldives, Republic of the Union of Myanmar, Republic of South Sudan, Center for Study and Media Affairs at Saudi Royal Court, Socialist Republic of Vietnam. These entities get a louder voice in US government than US citizens.
It is clear that a violation of the Voorhees Act is occurring.
Not only is this technically illegal, it is obviously unethical and it should boggle every American’s mind that these people are allowed anywhere near public office. Yet, they are in the White House and have been for a long, long time. The media has gone out of it’s way to make sure you don’t see it for what it really is. Organized crime.
18 U.S. Code § 2386 - Registration of certain organizations
The following organizations shall be required to register with the Attorney General: Every organization subject to foreign control which engages in political activity; In fact, the Kazakhstan government felt exactly the way Americans should feel. Mukhtar Dzhakishev, who worked with Clinton to pass off the mining interests to Russia, was charged under articles of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan:
Article 177, section 3 - large scale fraud committed by an organised group;
Article 176, section 3, - misappropriation of entrusted property on a large scale committed by an organised group;
Article 311, section 5 - accepting a bribe in a large amount.
Article 176 - misappropriation of entrusted property;
Article 307 - abuse of power.
Everyone has forgotten about convicted felon, Bob Creamer, and massive election fraud proven by O’Keefe’s hidden cameras.
The Clinton Foundation is a CIA front that runs pay for play and forensic interruption to keep it's clients out of jail. The CIA has co-opted resources in Russian energy.
Russia isn't our enemy, they are controlled by the intelligence community and they have to pay into our protection racket. Meanwhile, the news is in the pocket of our intelligence community and it isn't meant to inform you, it is used as a tool of policy change where it 1) is always gradually asserting authoritarianism and 2) always hiding the activities of the intelligence community.
This is done according to "Systems Psychodynamics" based on Wilfred Bion's basic assumption theories.
The evidence is everywhere, but the bare bones are as follows.
Podesta also received 100,000 shares from Joule, over 4 years.
That is the board at Joule. All Russian CEOs, including Sberbank, Troika Dialog, Rusnano and Rosatom.
They all worked together to make the Uranium One deal happen.
Chaika is exposed in this documentary that is banned in Russia.
Yuri Chaika was in put in power by Medvedev, but he indicates to an intelligence analyst that Sergei Ivanov is calling the shots.
Chaika said he has already been under a lot of heat because of the Politkovskaya arrests. He said that he would rather not tell me about the "Chechen mastermind" they arrested. I asked if this was because he was not really a mastermind and Chaika said that "many things needed to be tied up as we head into this election and the end of Putin's reign." [I know this is strange, but he kept saying things like, "Ivanov needs to have control over the situation he's about to enter into.... Ivanov is known for his distance from such situations, so they need to be wrapped up."
What is crazy, is that even organized crime won't go near energy assets, which is a playground that Podesta, Hillary and the DNC have no problem playing in. That is a really interesting point... that they scare the Russian mob.
Either way, these people at the top of Russian politics are very often cooperating with our own intelligence assets. Here is a list: (Preview) Stratfor's Spreadsheet below:
During the course of the Uranium One scandal, Gazprom was also acquiring extraction rights and expanding with more locations and resources.
the company builds pipelines around the world and Gazprom wanted the the company, so the owner of the company ended up with his shoulders broken and stuffed into a pipeline. Then they turned on the nat gas and he suffocated while his limbs flew off in the 50 mph nat gas flow.....
The news in the US doesn't actually educate people on how Russian corruption works because that would elucidate ties to our own government.
And here is how the news tricks you while attempting to appear neutral…
The New York Times and Media Matters work together to “set the goal posts” of this issue:
Cash Flowed to the Clintons Amid Russian Uranium Deal:
NBC News Just Admitted The NY Times' Story Based On Clinton Cash "Doesn't Hold Up That Well," Here's Why:
want to join the discussion? login or register in seconds.
sort by:
New Bottom Intensity Old
Sort: Top

[–] thewebofslime [S] 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)
At no point do either of these articles mention some of the most important evidence. They don’t explain Troika Dialog. They don’t explain the Panama Papers. They never get around to addressing the 100,000 shares of Joule vested over 4 years at 25,000 shares per year into Leonidas. However, reading both of these articles, you can feel informed about the issue, while never being able to come to any type of solid conclusion. That is how the news works.
The truth is that the deal started with Kazatomprom and the guy in charge was arrested and jailed for treason, abuse of power, corruption, and embezzling natural resources for his own personal profit. His name was Moukhtar Dzhakishev
Why do we not bring democracy to Russia by leaking all of their corruption? The same reason Russia doesn’t do the same thing to us. They have an ongoing financial relationship.
Qatar and Glencore are both involved with the Clintons in questionable ways. Marc Rich, the CEO of Glencore was given a last minute pardon by Bill Clinton, while in office. Ironically, James Comey was the prosecutor. The documents are partially available in the FBI Vault.
Qatar’s US weapon purchases were expanded 1400% after donating to the Clinton Foundation.
It should trouble every American that this is business as usual. Particularly when the press is in on it.
This is a list of journalists who collaborated with the DNC, to varying degrees, as exposed by Wikileaks:
Still, there are other channels of communications than just Podesta’s Gmail account or Hillary’s private server. The Wikileaks list is only a glimpse.
Scandal forced the Podesta Group to amend their past relationships AGAIN and we start to see how things really work in Washington. A lobbying group accepts money from foreign countries and private companies so that they have more of a voice in government and policy than the American voters.
After Donald Trump won the election, the Podesta Group filed the most revealing list, yet, in a form known as ‘Amendment to Registration Statement Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended.”
This is one piece of that document that shows that lobbying firms make deals with the news to represent their client’s interest. We already know what these conversations look like from Wikileaks; varying degrees of cooperation.
This is the whole document:
So, what is being revealed here is that the Clinton Foundation has taken over for the American Security Council Foundation in looking out for the mining interests in the world. What is scary is that, even according to the State Department Reports, the Kazakhstan mines use slave labor. Glencore uses slave labor. VCS Mining uses slave labor.
You should be aware of the proven criminal conspiracies that the CIA has subjected American citizens to.
“Several of the children who Cameron experimented on were sexually abused, in at least one case by several men. One of the children was filmed numerous times performing sexual acts with high-ranking federal government officials, in a scheme set up by Cameron and other MKULTRA researchers, to blackmail the officials to ensure further funding for the experiments.”
The leaks reveal some interesting things, but interpreting them can be difficult without historical context, so I’ll stick to the easy ones.
Subject: Re: El Paso Gunrunner and African Merc Dad is June 1951. Looks like his social is somehow connected to Francisco Bustamante, the pool player.
Re: El Paso Gunrunner and African Merc
Stand down, Agency front
In 2006, Howard Dean’s former campaign plane crashed with 5 tons of cocaine.
In 2007, a plane that was used in extraordinary renditions and carried prisoners to Guantanamo, crashed with a few tons of cocaine, as well.
The planes and pilots disappeared.
Marine Special Forces are eliminating the Sinaloa’s competition, the Zetas.
“known and authorized at the highest levels of the Justice Department and which included agents from ATF, DEA, FBI, ICE, and the IRS, allowed guns to be illegally purchased in the United States and transported to Mexico to end up in the hands of members of drug cartels.”
tl;dr #2: The intelligence community has its fingers in drugs, guns and human trafficking. They also employ agent provocateurs and utilize principles from systems psychodynamics to manipulate people's basic assumptions as a tool of policy change while directing the media to divert the populace's attention away from activities of the intelligence community.
[–] TimePiece -2 points (+0|-2) ago 
@drenki @badruns @Solstiare AHAHAHAHAHH #JPL
[–] kammmmak 0 points (+0|-0) ago 
Scp 2 ccp 0
[–] Greenzero86 2 points (+2|-0) ago 
Maybe that's why they killed that panama papers journalist.
[–] Drenki 1 points (+1|-0) ago 
The bigger picture is how much uranium from this deal has been "lost"?
[–] badruns 0 points (+0|-0) ago 
iirc it was a double digit percent of the US' uranium stockpile like 20%
[–] Drenki 0 points (+0|-0) ago 
they put 20% of the us uranium stockpile into terrorist hands? I don't believe it's that much
[–] Solstiare 1 points (+1|-0) ago 
Judas Priest that's a deep rabbit hole
[–] derram 1 points (+1|-0) ago : :
Two Democratic operatives lose jobs after James O’Keefe sting - The Washington Post : :
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal - The New York Times :
NBC News Just Admitted The NY Times' Story Based On Clinton Cash "Doesn't Hold Up That Well," Here's Why
This has been an automated message.PNG
[–] Skeptic2 0 points (+0|-0) ago 
Not the key to it all. See

Indictment Affidavit by M Mali on Scribd